About the Lawcards Series
Jurisprudence Lawcards Checklist
What you need to know…
Chapter 1 The nature of jurisprudence
- Definitions of jurisprudence
- Key jurisprudential questions: what is the law/what constitutes good law
- Austin's division between analytical and normative jurisprudence
- Other subdivisions of jurisprudence
- The terminology of jurisprudence
- Formalist and contents approaches to moral philosophy
- Hart's definitions of positivism
- Branches of utilitarianism
- General questions arising from jurisprudence's two key questions
Chapter 2 Natural law theory
- What is natural law?
- Sources of the higher principles reflected in law
- Key tenets of natural law theory
- The development of natural law theory throughout the ages
- Aquinas' integration of the rationalist and religious approaches to natural law
- JM Finnis' modern natural law theory
- Practical reasonableness and the objective goods
- How is the ‘ought' derived from the ‘is' for Finnis?
- The Principle of Generic Consistency
- Main criticisms of natural law theory
Chapter 3 Positivist theories of law
- What is the positivist approach to law?
- The ‘is' and ‘ought' questions in legal positivism
- Devices used to identify law
- Imperative theories of law
- Bentham's approach to law
- The distinction between expositional and censorial jurisprudence
- What is good law for Bentham?
- Austin's command theory of law
- Elements of the statement “law is the command of a sovereign backed by sanctions”
- Hart's criticism of Austin
- Kelsen's pure theory of law
- Kelsen's distinction between primary and secondary norms
- Kelsen's distinction between subjective/objective meanings of actions
- The hierarchy of norms/concept of the basic norm
- Criticisms applicable to imperative theories
Chapter 4 Theoretical alternatives to the command models of law
- Hart on coercion, rules and morality
- Distinction between obedience and compliance
- Hart's definition of a ‘rule'
- Primary and secondary rules
- The systemic quality of law
- Rule of recognition/rules of change/rules of adjudication
- The “internal morality of law” according to Fuller
- Fuller's eight rules of proper law-making
- The Hart-Fuller debate
- Hart's criticisms of Fuller's “inner morality of law”
- Dworkin's criticisms of natural law and legal positivism
- Dworkin's criticism of Hart
- The difference between rules and principles for Dworkin
- Dworkin and judicial discretion
Chapter 5 Utilitarianism
- Bentham's utilitarianism: key elements
- The principle of utility
- The felicific calculus
- The science of legislation/the art of legislation
- The Panopticon
- Criticisms of Bentham's utilitarianism
- J.S. Mill and qualitative altruism
- The place of justice in Mill's work
- The role of liberty in utilitarian theory
- Utilitarianism and the economic analysis of law
- Posner's economics of justice
Chapter 6 Rights
- Hohfeld's four categories of basic rights
- Jural opposites/jural correlatives/jural contradictories
- Rawls and justice as fairness
- Rawls' criticism of utilitarianism
- The original position and veil of ignorance
- Rawls' two principles of justice
- Nozick's theory of entitlements
- Dworkin's rights thesis
- Dworkin's principles and policies
- Dworkin's rights as ‘trumps'
Chapter 7 Theories of law and society
- Difference between sociological jurisprudence, sociology of law and socio-legal studies
- Central assumptions of sociological jurisprudence
- Weber's three ideal stages of development
- Durkheim and social solidarity
- What is functionalism?
- What are socio-legal studies?
- Sociology of law
- Unger's three types of law
- Marx's six stages of development
- Historical/dialectical materialism
- Pashukanis
- Marxism today
Chapter 8 Feminist legal theory
- Feminism as political activism
- The equality/difference debate
- The public/private divide
- Feminism and power
- The feminist challenge to the reasonable man test
- The question of freedom
- How does feminist legal theory relate to legal practice?
- Feminism and political philosophy
- Key figures in feminist theory
Chapter 9 Critical legal studies
- What are critical legal studies?
- In what way do they differ from more traditional critiques of the law?
- The history of the CLS movement
- The claims and objectives of the American crits
- The decline of American CLS
- Freud's parallel between law and the law of the unconscious
- The Freudian myth of the origin of the law
- Lacan's inversion of the Freudian premise
- Foucault and the genealogical method
- Structuralism/post-structuralism
- CLS and deconstruction